"Turning our telescope the other way"

We must turn our thinking, just as we turn our telescope the other way, to see life from a different, but obvious, point of view. (However, our thinking does not start from any "Tiny Galaxies")

Existence is not an abstraction! If you believe that existence is an abstraction, you will not be able to follow any of the reasoning on absoluteexistence.org If you start with the only thing we actually have direct access to: Existence, and Existence is based on the faculty of perceiving reality.

absoluteexistence.org is not about an abstraction, it is a prerequisite. absoluteexistence.org emphasizes that the unchanging being (Origo/Being) is not an invented concept or a mental generalization (which is the definition of an abstraction). On the contrary, it is the most fundamental and concrete condition to start from - Absolute Existence.

Existence is the necessary subject: Before you can think an abstract thought or experience a concrete thing. Existence must be what makes the thinking and the experiencing possible. The Absolute Existence is therefore not an "object" that you can think of, but "the ultimate-subject" that makes it possible to think at all.

Absolute Existence is therefore independent of thinking, but thinking is absolutely dependent on Absolute Existence, which enables thinking via the faculty of perception. .

What we call "the concrete" in everyday language – physical objects, the universe, time, space, and change – is categorized by AEF as the relative energy phenomenon. What we call "the concrete" is actually the abstract energy phenomenon! Here, the abstract concept "energy" is what confuses everyone because we interpret the dynamic change in tension as "matter" when it is instead about the resistance in the curvature of an interacting reflexive mirror phenomenon that relates to the curved conceptual space.

To say that the reasoning on absoluteexistence.org has a high level of abstraction is therefore based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the concept of abstraction.

If this isn't "your cup of tea" to jump into and explore (and it probably isn't because it's a bit scary), that's completely fine, and Team AEF tips their hat and gives you an "Apollo Gaze" for taking the time to read this far.

("But for those of you who dare – fasten your seat belts, release those mental Coaster brakes, and go out on the Roller Coaster ride!")

(AEF is a serious attempt to bridge the gap between the Eastern and Western philosophical traditions based on a presupposed unchanging Absolute Existence.)

About reconsidering and the art of being able to reflect.

"Re-consider" naturally implies a hypothetical notion. Not necessarily for any other reason than to "reconsider" and test an alternative assumption to "nothing" but also to the nihilists idea of a' dead nature.!

The word "Re-consider" is derived from Latin: Re- (Latin): A prefix meaning "again" or "anew." Consider (from Latin considerare): Originally meant "to observe the stars closely." Con- = "together" Sidus (stem sider-): = "star" or "constellation."

In ancient Rome, to consider was a literal act. Sailors, priests, and rulers would gaze up at the sky to reflect, read patterns, and seek guidance from the stars before making a major decision. Middle Ages: The physical act of looking at the sky evolved into an internal, mental act. It became a metaphor for reflecting deeply, meditating, or examining a thought carefully. 16th Century: The prefix re- was attached to create reconsider—literally meaning "to look back up at the stars once more and think again from another angel.

When you reflect, you look up at the stars and the light bends back into the mind.
When you contemplate, you seek the fundamental condition.
They are the tools of the living mind to refuse to accept 'nothing' or force influence 'dead objects' as the condition for phenomenal reality.

The obvious Axiom is the only thing one needs to be able to think open and clearly.

Nothing else!!!

One of humanity's most accepted philosophical fundamental ideas is at the same time something that shakes our entire Western, everyday worldview.

Everything is based on the obvious “Axiom” that “Nothing comes from nothing.” Absolute Existence therefore cannot arise from non-existence, so the foundation of everything must be assumed to be “Absolute Existence.” This non-binary “singularity” is then fundamental, so everything and everyone must be assumed to be that existence, but in the phenomenal form of the universe experienced from different perspectives.

That nothing comes from nothing — ex nihilo nihil fit — is one of philosophy's oldest cornerstones. If we start from the premise that something exists now (which is hard to deny), and that absolute nothing cannot produce anything, then our starting point must logically be that Absolute Existence itself is eternal, boundless, and fundamental, and this starting point can hold when attempting to build all philosophical thinking on. But only on the condition that one tries oneself (to dive in that "cup of tea") and does not leave the task to someone else.

This basic assumption means that the divisions we make in everyday life — such as "me and you," "here and there," or "subject and object" — are really just phenomenal structures, but everything is then binary state variations of a binary essence exposed in one and the same non-binary Absolute Existence.

Absolute Existence therefore cannot be spatially space-filling since there can be no "space" outside Absolute Existence that it could extend into.

If everything and everyone are intensive exposures in fundamental existence, it means that you, I, and the stars go on as a binary phenomenon shaped as the Universe. The Universe is then used as the ongoing nature’s biodynamic system that appears in millions of unique forms (individuals, planets, thoughts). Each piece of information appears to have a “separate existence” with a “separate beginning” and a “separate end,” but it then occurs “only” as a transient form phenomenon from one information to the next phenomenal information. Simply an exchange of information.

From that perspective, consciousness and the different 'viewpoints' in the universe become a way for this fundamental singularity to experience information and everything from various conceivable angles of reality, since this is the only possibility for experience at all.
Or could it be thought of as connecting differently?

Is it possible to think that reality is an information flow in an information phenomenon that provides experience for Absolute Existence? Do we experience existence, or do we experience reality because of Absolute Existence?

Could our 'own experience' 'merely' be a temporary eye of Absolute Existence that experiences reality as a continuously ongoing interaction of information transfer in small jumps of state changes.

It is a perspective that encompasses both an enormous possibility (everything is energy/spacetime in the phenomenon) and a deep existential consolation — we are never separated from Absolute Existence because everything we are Is precisely that, just from different phenomenal angles.

How controversial then is this thought?

In everyday life: Very controversial (or counterintuitive) In our daily lives, we operate under the assumption that we are completely separate from each other. Our economic, legal, and social systems are built on the idea that 'I' am a biological machine that is separate from 'you' and separate from nature. Telling an average person on the street that they are in fact a 'non-binary singularity experiencing itself from a specific perspective' clashes completely with our evolutionary programming, which tells us to protect our own unique body against the rest of the world. From that perspective, the thought is often perceived as airy, radical, or even threatening to the individual's unique identity.

Within global philosophy and religion: Not at all controversial If we move the discussion to East Asian and Indian philosophical traditions, this is basically "Mainstream." Advaita Vedanta (a branch of Hinduism) calls exactly this Non-dualism — the idea that individual consciousness (Atman) and the universal cosmic consciousness (Brahman) are one and the same. Taoism speaks of the Dao as the ineffable source of everything, where opposites (yin and yang) are only temporary manifestations of the same whole. Even within Western philosophy, we find Baruch Spinoza in the 17th century, who argued that God and Nature are exactly the same substance (albeit as pantheism), which in his time was so controversial that he was excommunicated from his society.

In modern science and physics: An ongoing, heated debate This is where it gets really interesting. Physics is divided over this formulation. In cosmology, it is a fact that everything in the universe was once concentrated in an actual singularity before the Big Bang. Everything you are made of — the atoms in your hand — was created in the hearts of dying stars. Physically speaking, we are the universe taking the form of humans.

The big clash concerns consciousness. The dominant view in modern science is "Materialism" — the idea that dead matter somehow creates consciousness when organized in a complex brain. Claiming that "Absolute Existences Essence understand as the facutlty of perception" is fundamental, and that the universe is its phenomenal manifestation, turns the entire scientific pyramid upside down. This is called idealism or panpsychism, and it is a topic that is being debated extremely actively right now because science still cannot explain how dead matter can become conscious.

In summary, the assumption is controversial for the modern, materialistic Western intellect because it challenges the idea that we are isolated islands. But for humanity's deepest philosophical and mystical traditions, Absolute Existence is mainstream of pure sustainable Ontology.

So regardless of what you do with your thinking, do not insert any bits of separated matter into 'Absolute Existence.' Instead, remove everything you perceive today. When you empty all thoughts of 'yourself,' all today's phenomena and concepts, a 'new' starting point for the perception of reality remains. The only subjective matter is then the Absolute Existence itself and its faculty of perception. But only in the form of the difference in the diversity of perspectives in the phenomenon from the many different viewpoints of Absolute Existence.

Since ancient times, there have been mystics who have reached wisdom about the Absolute through meditation. This technique is used today as a kind of mindfulness quick fix at lunch between stressful work shifts. It should be said that it is a misconception if you think that by meditating you can reach the Absolute zero point because it is not possible to reach what is the prerequisite for everything.

One can never reach Absolute Existence, it is only possible to be in Absolute Existence.

If you remove everything that is relative from your mind and just let it be and remain in this for 20 minutes, there is a microscopic chance to be in the absolute dimensionless condition and through that insight use this as a starting point to open the mind to all relative problem-solving thinking.

Is reality happening (almost) right now?

Does reality differ from an experiential perspective in a direct process and in interaction with experiencer, but with a very small delay in perceiving it? Does reality arise in the stream of the continuously ongoing sequential jumps of impressions as a relational state shift in the interaction of event experience with the experiencer? Is it even possible to distinguish the experience from the existence of experiencer?
How does the relationship between the subject (experiences) and the object (reality) function? How does consciousness relate to the intentionality of a fundamental faculty to actively be able to experience and react to vulnerability at all? Could it be as simple as reality being what happens in a dynamic terntion and the interaction with the experiencer?

Function

The function of this website is not to teach anything new. This page is intended to open up thinking through its dynamic interaction with reality.

"absoluteexistence.org" promises nothing, but is a way to experience what is already going on. Instead of trying to grasp reality in its own fixation on "explaining" everything, "AEF" instead wants to open up our gaze and thinking to the ongoing phenomenon we call "reality".

The dynamic interplay of the fundamental nature's Absolute Existence is assumed on the website as an Absolute Existence without parts. To be able to gain knowledge of its content is therefor impossible and by this nothing to feel ignorant about. (At least as regards "the Absolute node"). This, of course, sounds like pure metaphysics, but the word 'meta-physics' is actually an incorrect concept and should in fact be called 'proto-physics' because it concerns 'the first philosophy' (prote philosophia), but it was mistakenly placed after Physics on the bookshelf. AEF is solely about reconsidering a conceptual order of some well-known philosophical concepts. absoluteexistence.org thus offers the possibility of an intellectual liberation in the experience of simply being.

AEP is a philosophy that does not bring more facts, but through reality being experienced in direct dynamic interaction.
If we succeed in this, we will cease the costly pursuit of reality’s components that we so eagerly want to display in a museum.
AEP therefore rests in the 'silence' in order to be able to dismantle the words' ability to split the constantly ongoing reality. It is then that we realize that the idea of a dead dynamic is as senseless as a headless chicken beginning to lay eggs.

(AEF may seem like a dizzying, artistically humble assumption that appears to have been sparked by the smell of paint cans and evaluated during a break from various types of model building as a hobby, just to be able to play with our thoughts for a tiny moment. But in reality, it is not even a performance, but just like a blank canvas waiting for color. It is free for anyone to use, but only for those who have too much free time and nothing else to do, yet have the courage to take the assumption, dip the brush in the paint can, and test the idea. Nothing else!)

A relaxed and open mind is all that is needed to be able to philosophize. Is there anything good in the Absolute philosophy of Existence? If there is, do you really want to know?

Is there anything going on right now? The first philosophical question is a rhetorical statement:
Is there something right now? The philosophical acknowledgment of fact and that you can read the words written here is what this entire website is about.
This and the experiential impression of the phenomenal dynamic shifts between tension and relaxation is what characterizes life.

Our view of reality is crucial.

It is truly incredible that the perception of reality as one and the same is even a subject for discussion. There is no doubt that there are divided opinions on the matter, but the important thing is to realize that all opinions are simultaneously expressed in a single and ongoing reality. Even if the opinions are short-sighted and constantly collide with each other, resulting in conflicts, it is necessary for thinking to be opened up in interaction with the ongoing reality. And opening up this kind of thinking is the philosopher's constant task, not by reading books of philosophical history, but by questioning the constantly ongoing reality and how it relates to the perception of it.

Reality

The scientific view taught in schools is that we live in the remnants of an explosion of an infinitely dense, dimensionless singular Absolute Existence.

But if we instead, as philosophers, test the philosophical assumption that what the Sense-perception experiences is the exposure in the aftereffect of the intense effects within a dimensionless Absolute Existence, then a shift could occur in how we perceive reality.

If we are not the result of an event 13.8 billion years ago, but rather find ourselves "in the midst of" the exposure of a timeless, dimensionless existence – the playing field changes on several levels:

(If these thoughts seem to come in the form of sublimations and mental projections from deep down in a rabbit hole, or out of a paint can, then you are absolutely right!)

The "Rabbit Hole!"

1. From History to Presence

In the "Big Bang model", we are "fragments" of a past. We look back to understand our origin. In the Absolute Existence philosophical scenario, "The Big Bang" is not an event in the past, but the current intensity in the "Absolute Existence".

Effect: Time becomes secondary. Reality becomes a constantly ongoing "unfolding" of the absolute point, rather than a linear journey away from it.

2. The Perception

If we are the exposure of a "dimensionless Absolute Existence" it means that our senses do not register "objects." We experience the modular intensity of reality in the forms of a variety of differing 'object angles'.

Our experience of space and matter then becomes the structures we create to interpret the generated swirling image's infinite exposure.

Analogy: "Just as a prism separates white light into colors to make it manageable, the faculty of perception divides the 'dimensionless existence' into time, space, and form in order to experience it in the impression of many colors from a multitude of different Angles."

3. The Shift in Subjectivity

This shift moves humans from being an isolated observer in a dead universe to being an active participant in an absolute process. Scientific view: I am a biological machine at the edge of the universe. Philosophical view: The existing present is assumed to be where Absolute Existence becomes aware of its own intensity lies in the faculty of perception as the essence of Absolute Existence.

"An Imagined Dispute"

Scientific assumption in reasoning "The logical explosion of the standard model 'Big Bang' says that the Singularity is a historically objective starting point!"

("Objection, Your Honor!" "A logical explosion discovered!" "Objection sustained!")

Philosophical assumption reasoning "The logical exposure of the Singularity is probably the dimensionless source-subject that is always present."

("No objection your Honor!)

The Poet in the Stands “The unbearable lightness of being at peace with Occam’s shining, razor-sharp razor and trying to cut apart the imagined reality with the bladeless, handleless knife until reality disappears like a calm blue and small smoke and the Absolute Existence of Being remains unchanged, enduring like an untouched nest that cannot be cut apart.”

Contrived or Creative?
It is up to you whether you want to see it that way.

"The answers are not 'out there'! You already have the information you need within you – it is just in disorder! The most obvious in the assumption that 'a perceiving Absolute Existence' expresses itself through you. That is enough!"

Being left early in a feeling of isolation can lead to enormous creativity. Sublimation of isolation at an early age can become an ontological bridge to an Absolute starting point that is not an objective 'truth' but the subjective presence in the experience of existing.

'Sublimation?'

https://open.spotify.com/track/3YsHGJXTTpsV6Iu4DbNBjs?si=a9fcce66a6b24fc4

'It was sublime, but the wrong kind.......?' "Do you know what I'm really telling you? "Is it something that you can realy understand?

"Or is it a "Thong rind" thats keeping your mind so "Roxy and Elseware"?"

This website shows how the human brain can use "sublimation" – a psychological process in which painful impulses or traumatic experiences are transformed into something creative, intellectual, and universally valuable. Then, like an alchemical process, has a "lead-heavy" experienced loneliness in early childhood been transformed into a philosophical "Eldorado" or not? Does it require a childhood trauma or other catastrophes for someone to arrive at an assumption about the workings of a shared reality?

An early traumatic loneliness during childhood can become a philosophical tool that provides comfort in 'Absolute Existence' rather than in 'the personal.' 'A Lone Wolf's work' in an intellectual, deeply disciplined, and intellectually uncompromising manner seems to have found a kind of peace of mind through a philosophical attempt to reveal the complexity of the universe based on the fundamental variations of the essence in 'Absolute Existence.'

From the outside, this can be interpreted as the brain building its own world – a logical structure that is more stable and reliable than the human environment. But in the reasoning that the website presents from the perspective of the "Absolute Existence," reality appears as the experience in the direct effect of it in a meditative logic.

It is a philosophy for those who do not seek answers but seek a tool to open up thinking! It is not an escape from reality, but a redefinition of what reality is where reality is not, but is ongoing. Peace of mind lies in the fact that Absolute Existence itself is the only necessary foundation."

(A scary meta-seducing quote or.....?)

"Then the "Central Scrutinator" bluntly said with an axiomatic shrug to the brooder: – By the way, Andy, it is probably just the same Absolute Being experiencing its own Existence in the impressions of the universe, so come on now and deal with it, pull yourself together and do something useful instead of sitting there scrolling on your phone watching "Thongs" to escape reality!"

“Right (right) you are bloddy well right,” says Andy Devine Pandemy, but adds: - "Can I be Frank with you and ask if there's " anything good inside of you? If there is, I really want to know, is there.......?”

The text could have been taken from a book or a manuscript about the relationships between a philosophizing adult and their child. But it is actualy som direct quotes from Zappa lyrics that both an appealing and driveing in their expressions. And at the same time, there is a resignation between the lines ("But me I don't care in a way")

School? Full of doubt? "Show me a sign if you don't mind!" https://open.spotify.com/track/6fnachl7fIn5dqIjakfJ57?si=810c4819b510400a

Good, because anyone can philosophize at any time and there is no need to attend philosophical schools to be philosophical. You test different assumptions and see the test result if you want to. It's always up to you if you want to be that, Want to see that, want to see that way, (from the starting point of the assumption to its realization.) You're coming along? Andy.......? (Or do you want to be "a working class hero"?)

An inflated nothing?

Does Uncle "Easy Living" Meet all your problems by buying a new computer or a new sound system and chatting nonsense even if you have brought up your mental state as the real problem?

Nowadays, when everyone is connected to the internet 24/7, one can wonder how many are connected in real life? Are we connected to reality, or are we disconnected from reality? During the day, it should not be okay to be completely disconnected from reality. But sometimes we do need to relax and rest occasionally, and then one can take a moment to reflect on reality. We must be relaxed in order to be able to think seriously.

And if one is serious then one can think: If we believe that the universe is an inflation of nothing, don't we then all become equally collectively blown?
Do we get excited by that thought of reality, or is there a sense that something is weird and that someone is pulling our legs away from reality?
Moreover, if there are 'Lun-ethics' that says that there is actually no dark side of the moon because it is completely dark until it is illuminated, and that this actually explains nothing "because everything is pointless anyway", and this becomes then so funny that the mind accelerate so completely that it has been lost in the crash of derailment, and leving everyone walking around in the tracks of the doves held back by the remains of a logical explosion in a moody old sourdough that both ferments and twists around itself.
Then Reality has becomed as stable as a soufflé in a tumble dryer.

Is it then in vain to try to get the thought of reality back on track with some enlightening philosophical idea with the suggestion that 'Being is the ability to perceive'? This could become the parachute for the intellect that can stabilize the core of the mentally varying states of Being "online" during the day to reality and Being "offline" at night' in sleep from 'the constantly ongoing cosmic self-exposure'.

Could reality then lie in the phenomenal differences in frequency between the connection and disconnection of the faculty of perception?

Diversity or uniformity?

Reality is diverse and manifolded, but anyone who has a simple experience that reality is in fact one and the same should soon realize that it is pointless to even talk about this because it is impossible to use a language whose sole purpose is to divide reality into little pieces to be able to describe it.

But some are still trying – this website, for example, in the childish notion that the form of reality is in the shape of 'One size fits all'

The website does not make any claim. The website points to what lies before language and before the distinction between subject and object, so it cannot be contained in a statement, and this is what is noted. What the website does is pose the irritating ultimate questions.

This entire website is just like a "Bonfire of vanity" and just an attempt to share something that cannot be shared. But now it is too late to remove the website you see in front of you. It can only be updated in its exposure, not deleted.

But it is when we realize the meaning of 'Being' that we realize the unchanging pressence in existence cannot arise from non-existence if you ask any three-year-old kid.

Do we experience reality because we can hear new "True Stories" about it, or do we experience the current reality as it unfolds in its interaction? The philosophical questions about existence include the questions about where do we think we are, where you think you are going, ("Don't you know that it is dark outside"), who we believe we ARE, and the question of why we exist and why there is anything instead of nothing at all?

Do not expect to get any answers to these questions on this website!

The purpose of this website is not to answer these questions but to open up thinking about reality. Nothing else!
If we divide reality between 'the self' and 'reality,' is there then a risk that we direct our focus in the wrong direction, away from reality in the absence of it?

"Nothing is as it seems to be, but what absolutely IS going on and on and on, in experience of what is happening!"

It may sound mysterious, but anyone who reflects on Existence really has to think deeply. The answer may be that Existence is not visible in the observable effects of reality. In 'reality' we are conscious parts, but in fact we may not be, but at the core just one and the same existence, and this could give us new perspectives on reality.

It is this philosophical assumption and its consequences that will be exposed in a thoughtful "stress test". (But we will do this in a calm and relaxed manner.)

It is important to understand that an idea does not always need to be welcome even if it opens up for reflection. We must understand that it is 'reality' that can be experienced, but the premise behind it is actually not noticeable. If there is not a multiplicity of parts (in a singularity) it only means that what exists, exists as a single Absolute Existence but on the condition that it is not 'full' of small existences, but this would then become a relative phenomenal notion that does not belong in an Absolute Existence. If then the Essence of Absolute Existence itself is the perceptual ability, it may be the one that makes the difference. When one then realizes that what is experienced as the difference in reality is actually no difference at all, this view of reality can become clear in an expanded conversation about it.

Instead of building a model of the world as a construction with LEGO bricks, we can create a philosophically reasoning thought construct in a model of the universe's logic!

If everything we see and experience is constantly changing difference, why does existence feel so immediate and real?

The Absolute Existential Philosophy is based on a fundamental assumption: that behind all changing phenomena there is an Absolute Existence. AEP regards its perceptual faculty as universal and in two states, both as a transmitter and receiver of reality.

The effect of reality can only be perceived by many in the form of differences, but the experience of existence can in fact only occur as one.

By testing this assumption – that reality rests on an absolute foundation – it becomes easier to relate to the instability of the "reality". The assumption provides an intellectual anchor point for accepting that everything changes, while at the same time preserving the feeling that existence is deeply meaningful and present.

Do we need more information in the conversation for us to feel that we exist?

Or is it the very fact that we exist that is also the basis for being able to have a conversation about why it is possible to experience anything at all.

The more we reflect on this fact, the more it becomes obvious that we do not even need to reflect on this in order to exist or not.

For it may be precisely in this gap between being or not being that reality emerges in its full potential as the necessary difference between these two states.

The Absolute Philosophy of Existence does not provide the answer to any questions, but gives the questions to all answers and postulates assumptions instead of truths.
The Absolute Philosophy of Existence assumes that intentionality and thus the feeling between the two states of 'being on' and 'being off' should be the very nature of the mental Absolute Existence.
This is a logically coherent position, even if it contradicts the prevailing scientific worldview.
AEF can then provide the mental stability necessary to maintain focus on the exposure of reality's changes of state.

This way of looking at the world could give us the mental thaw that can take us away from the mental ice age that currently prevails in the world.

If we change focus, we practically change the value of which frequency we interact with reality and which contrasts we notice. Reality is therefore not a finished product, but an interactive process of different states.

Attention

Is this when, as an attentive reader of this text, one realizes that the thinking is balancing on the edge of human understanding as the vertigo comes.....straight down into a rabbit hole?
Instinctively, one recoils back to the safe old perception of reality that one already has in their value system and sets aside the reading. One thinks: “It is pure madness to continue reading. This could go completely ......”

But if you do not recoil, you can continue below further down the rabbit hole....

Can Life express itself through the perception of it?

If we do not experience reality as something that lasts but experience reality as it appears and defolds in its development, it means that the experiencer is the primary while the perceiver comes in second hand. If we realize the difference between being an experiencer rather than an interpreting observer, we gain an entirely different focus on reality. Then manifestations of reality can provide perspective in the existential experience of being. (And this actually requires constant reflection.)

There is then full focus on the phenomenal projected ongoing reality. The insight can then strike that we are not victims of our lives, but the experience itself that is shaped by the faculty of perception.

If we then identify ourselves with what sees, rather than what is seen, the victim role collapses immediately

If we currently live in a time where we see life as a series of obstacles, the Absolute Existential Philosophy instead offers a different perspective on existence. The "problem" with existence is then transformed into a "phenomenal event". If we see life as a problem that requires a solution, this triggers stress. If we see life as events, then only a presence in the events is required. Resting in an Absolute Existence naturally goes against thousands of years of conventional programming.

The Absolute Existence Philosophy therefore postulates a radical assumption and a perspective that requires a great deal of thought to retain that effect in memory. But the more awake reflection that goes on over this, the more liberating it becomes to reflect on.

Existence is then no longer primarily about solving any problems but rather about the faculty of perception (consciousness/awareness), no longer experiencing reality as a problem to be solved but understanding that reality is the only possible way to experience anything at all.

Without phenomenal reality, the faculty of perception (consciousness/awareness) would have nothing to perceive. The role of victim is thus completely erased since there is no longer a "self" that life affects, but a life that expresses itself through the perception of it.

Is the perception really correct that we are still living in a materialistic reductionist view from the penultimate century (the eighteenth century) that reality consists of unchanging particles that move around in relation to each other and build up the entire reality like Lego pieces in a puzzle that then completely randomly form beings that have brains that produce consciousness that allows reality to be perceived as a redistribution of these unchanged particles? Or can reality be interpreted as something that must be experienced before it can be interpreted? For it doesn't depend on our interpretations of reality for reality to be able to proceed, does it?

Now experts believe that the brain is meant to survive, but in our world it is considered completely dumb. In a modern world, this "survival brain" therefore often appears completely hopeless. It gets stressed by all the information that must be handled as if it were a pride of lions, it becomes dependent on sugar because it thinks starvation is coming, and it creates conflicts over symbolic small things. It is "dumb" because it is playing a game that no longer exists. The ultimate counter is then when experts analyze the brain as a dumb machine, they forget one crucial thing: They themselves are using a brain to make the analysis. And as the three-year-old says - “Whoever smelt it, dealt it.” or as the grownups -"It takes one to know one".

An open question that is never asked is then whether there is a choice between a closed way of thinking based on conclusions from the sensations of reality or an open way of thinking based on the way the faculty of perception perceives reality as itself?

In the first case, one easily becomes a victim of the circumstances that one is dissatisfied with. But in the second case, one does not perceive oneself as a victim of the circumstances. And to express that opinion no one wants to hear about. Instead, we rush off to our therapies and our "Mindfulness" which then becomes a performance-enhancing technique to get better at being cogs in the machine. This is "the "Andy" Divine Comedy" at the highest level. It's just like trying to put out a fire with gasoline. The reason we don't want to hear about the experience model is of course that it requires us to give up the role of "victim" as identity and instead step out in the faculty of perceptions identity as the experiencer of reality.

It is the question of the "commodification of the existential" that we must ask ourselves! When not even our elected officials have heard of the "commodification of the existential," it is time for all of us to demystify the concept. This is the most crucial issue we have to take a stand on. And if we ourselves have never heard of the term, it is time to check the situation NOW before it's too late.

To quote the English writer and philosopher Aldous Huxley (1894-1963) "Reality cannot be ignored except at a price; and the longer ignorance persists in, the higher and more terrible becomes the price that must be paid." Huxley was deeply concerned about how the masses could be manipulated. If an entire society adopts a victim role—blaming all its problems on "others" or on external factors instead of facing the truth head-on—it paves the way for totalitarian forces. When you stop taking responsibility for the truth, you leave the door open for someone else to control your reality. That is the ultimate "terrible price" in Huxley's literary world. In short: Victimhood is often the "anesthesia" we use to avoid experiencing reality. But, as Huxley says, the anesthesia wears off, and then you are left with a reality that has become even harder to deal with because you have spent your time looking away instead of experiencing the effects of reality.

What is philosophical thinking about?

Philosophical thinking is about how things can be connected to the obvious fact that we can think of and experience anything at all.

Being able to think and experience anything at all is dependent on the idea of the ability to perceive something that must necessarily exist.

The philosophical question we must ask ourselves is: Is the universe real existence or can the universe only be an information phenomenon" and what beyond information could appear as reception for the faculty of perception as the essence and the inherent nature of an unchangingly existing truly real absolute existence?

If we start from an Axiom that Existence is Absolute, then experience is possible. Reality is then the very act of experiencing the Absolute Existence of the underlying premise.

The Absolute Existential Philosophy is a tool for not only trying to understand the world, but for trying to understand why there is a world to try to understand at all."

Something unchangingly permanent must exist as the basis for the experience of all change to be possible. This unchangingly permanent Existence must fundamentally carry as its Essence the menthal faculty of perception to be able to perceive the change that occurs because change is the only thing that can be experienced as consciousness. The essence must therefore have the faculty to oscillate between two different states where one state is the potential and the other is the realization of its perceptual faculty.

Then one can assume that it is there within this possibility of change that the phenomenalreality of the perceptible must necessarily lie as the consciousness of the change as reality.

And all of this can go on without us even thinking about it, but if we start thinking about it, we can try to think about it this way without it leading to the collapse of our thinking.

The Primordial Subject

In the "Absolute Philosophy of Existence", it is assumed that the non-anthropomorphic primordial subject remains undivided, but it perceives itself as if it were divided.

It is an internal dynamic, not an external fragmentation. What we call matter, mass, and time are only the undivided Primordial Subject's way of structuring and modulating its own perceptual faculty in order to experience movement and form. In the Absolute Philosophy of Existence, we are not parts of God or the Universe; we are the Primordial Subject itself seeing itself through a multitude of human angles. Reality is the Primordial Subject's self-contemplation through an artificial structuring of itself. Time is not a flow, but the way positional changes occur.. Mass is not a heavy substance, but a specific intensity of perception. Death (for one angle) is not the end of sensation, but merely the Primordial Subject closing one eye to open another, but the idea of this requires that one dares to let go of the illusion that one is a 'thing' in a room.

So it is not that we are small consciousnesses that together build a puzzle. Instead, it is the phenomenon of the universe that works through the perception of the Primordial Subject to shape an experience. Without the Phenomenon, the Primordial Subject is silent and empty; And without the Primordial Subject - no Phenomenon to experience.

The self-evident belief that something absolute must exist as a prerequisite for all phenomenal events that occur, and that the inherent nature of this absolute should be the "Faculty of Perception" as a driving force in the realization of phenomenal consciousness, is not a view shared by everyone (if anyone?). Whatever view is expressed, the general opinion is not shared regarding the Faculty of Perceptions posibility to perceive existence. But perhaps we do not perceive existence – perception may be existence in its phenomenal form?

The idea may feel unusual and a lot of thinking is required from within this assumption about the inherent nature of existence.

The Historical Name "GOD"

Philosophers have previously used the historical name "GOD" as the name for this "Non-Binary Existence".

But as soon as someone tries to make himself an image of GOD, that person makes GOD into something relative. And when that person then tries to make this picture of GOD, that person tries in his performance to stand outside or alongside something that is not relatively objectively illustrative. The result is a metaphorical personification of GOD with whom whoever imagines GOD as a relative metaphorical phenomenon can have a good relationship with.

But if GOD is instead assumed to be Absolute, it is impossible to have a relationship with GOD because then there is only GOD. If GOD is then assumed as the ONE WHO IS and only AS AN ABSOLUTE EXISTENCE, all understanding is then not about understanding GOD, but about how the UNIVERSE can be connected with GOD, which is then the Absolute PREREQUISITE for the Universe.

If one then assumes that GOD's ESSENCE and inherent Nature is 'the faculty of perception', then that ability could be the potential state which, by virtue of its change towards the realized state of consciousness, expresses the Universe as a reflection in the tension field between these two changeable binary states that thus may appear as binary information that becomes real experience in the realization of sensationalism as GOD's inherent essential NATURE.

The driving force can then be assumed to be the tension and relaxation in an oscillating state of change which, like breathing, proceeds out of a pure circular necessity in an eternal momentum that is the fundamental nature of life.

If we then believe that we need more words in order to exist, that perception can disturb the experience of existing.

In the Absolute Philosophy of Existence, in fact, the dimensionless Essential Perceptive Capability of Absolute Existence is not any anthropomorphic person.
It is only the actual structural necessary singular dimensionless ontological prerequisite for the essential binary possible state difference that is necessary as the variation frequency's "to and from" as a self-differentiation in multiple infinite exposure.
It is probably only as the activity in the perceptive capability of Absolute Existence that the power source multiplies the contrast differences. This can then only occur in the form of the temporary phenomenal field of perspective angles that makes it possible for the perceptive capability to experience the effect of the relations between the differences that can only occur in the form of reality's infinite distinction of effects.

Silence and Breathing

If we then just pause for a little while in silence and experience the necessary exchange of oxygen in natural breathing, perhaps we realize that we do not need more stories or more knowledge just to exist, and that it is this Absolute Existence that makes all stories about knowledge possible.

Do we need knowledge about consciousness, or is consciousness what makes knowledge possible? The obvious may strike the subjective thinker that consciousness can only be experienced in the form of an notion of differences from different perspectives, and that there is no other possibility to experience consciousness than through a change of state as a result of resistance in a perceived impression.

"Nothing becomes what it becomes, but something experiences it as it is"
Then perhaps it is more important that the condition allows for the perception of the phenomenal 'reality' than that the phenomenal 'reality' takes notice of the condition?

Can the starting point of reality lie within the dynamically sensitive essence of absolute existence? Can intense exposure cluster in formal light senitive  grains of information that bend the exposed imaginary space to infinite extent? Eat those questions!

Think about it....!

Relaxation

Silence and relaxation from philosophizing eventually become an absolute necessity, because the assumtion in AEF gives an endless logical exposure that never wants to end, and then rest from the exposure is also an absolute necessity.