Foreword

What is philosophical thinking about?

Philosophical thinking is about how things can be connected to the obvious fact that we can think of and experience anything at all.

Being able to think and experience anything at all is dependent on the ability to perceive something that must necessarily exist.

The philosophical question we must ask ourselves is: 'If the universe is not an information phenomenon,' what else than bounded artificial information could appear as the reception of conscious information to the perceptual faculty as the essence and inherent nature of an unchangingly existing absolute existence?

The Absolute Existential Philosophy is a tool for not only trying to understand the world, but for trying to understand why there is a world to try to understand at all."

Something unchangingly permanent must exist as the basis for the experience of all change to be possible. This unchangingly permanent Existence must fundamentally carry as its Essence the faculty of perception to be able to perceive the change that occurs because change is the only thing that can be experienced as consciousness. The essence must therefore have the faculty to oscillate between two different states where one state is the potential and the other is the realization of its perceptual faculty.

Then one can assume that it is there within this possibility of change that the phenomenalreality of the perceptible must necessarily lie as the consciousness of the change as reality.

And all of this can go on without us even thinking about it, but if we start thinking about it, we can try to think about it this way without it leading to the collapse of our thinking.

The Primordial Subject

In the "Absolute Philosophy of Existence", it is assumed that the non-anthropomorphic primordial subject remains undivided, but it perceives itself as if it were divided.

It is an internal dynamic, not an external fragmentation. What we call matter, mass, and time are only the undivided Primordial Subject's way of structuring and modulating its own perceptual faculty in order to experience movement and form. In the Absolute Philosophy of Existence, we are not parts of God or the Universe; we are the Primordial Subject itself seeing itself through a multitude of human angles. Reality is the Primordial Subject's self-contemplation through an artificial structuring of itself. Time is not a flow, but the way positional changes occur.. Mass is not a heavy substance, but a specific intensity of perception. Death (for one angle) is not the end of sensation, but merely the Primordial Subject closing one eye to open another, but the idea of this requires that one dares to let go of the illusion that one is a 'thing' in a room.

So it is not that we are small consciousnesses that together build a puzzle. Instead, it is the phenomenon of the universe that works through the perception of the Primordial Subject to shape an experience. Without the Phenomenon, the Primordial Subject is silent and empty; And without the Primordial Subject - no Phenomenon to experience.

The self-evident belief that something absolute must exist as a prerequisite for everything phenomenal that is going on, and that the inherent nature of this absolute should be the power of perception as the driving force in the realization of phenomenal consciousness, is not obvious to everyone.

The idea may feel unusual and a lot of thinking is required from within this assumption about the inherent nature of existence.

The Historical Name "GOD"

Philosophers have previously used the historical name "GOD" as the name for this "Non-Binary Existence".

But as soon as someone tries to make himself an image of GOD, that person makes GOD into something relative. And when that person then tries to make this picture of GOD, that person tries in his performance to stand outside or alongside something that is not relatively objectively illustrative. The result is a metaphorical personification of GOD with whom whoever imagines GOD as a relative metaphorical phenomenon can have a good relationship with.

But if GOD is instead assumed to be Absolute, it is impossible to have a relationship with GOD because then there is only GOD. If GOD is then assumed as the ONE WHO IS and only AS AN ABSOLUTE EXISTENCE, all understanding is then not about understanding GOD, but about how the UNIVERSE can be connected with GOD, which is then the Absolute PREREQUISITE for the Universe.

If one then assumes that GOD's ESSENCE and inherent Nature is 'the faculty of perception', then that ability could be the potential state which, by virtue of its change towards the realized state of consciousness, expresses the Universe as a reflection in the tension field between these two changeable binary states that thus may appear as binary information that becomes real experience in the realization of sensationalism as GOD's inherent essential NATURE.

The driving force can then be assumed to be the tension and relaxation in an oscillating state of change which, like breathing, proceeds out of a pure circular necessity in an eternal momentum that is the fundamental nature of life.

If we then believe that we need more words in order to exist, that perception can disturb the experience of existing.

Silence and Breathing

If we then just pause for a little while in silence and experience the necessary exchange of oxygen in natural breathing, perhaps we realize that we do not need more stories or more knowledge just to exist, and that it is this Absolute Existence that makes all stories about knowledge possible.

Do we need knowledge about consciousness, or is consciousness what makes knowledge possible? The obvious may strike the subjective thinker that consciousness can only be experienced in the form of an notion of differences from different perspectives, and that there is no other possibility to experience consciousness than through a change of state as a result of resistance in a perceived impression.

Or is it?