Ontos Origo

This is not a philosophical conclusion but an examination of a philosophical assumption about what must underlie even the possibility of making any assumption about anything at all.

Non-existence is an impossible starting point. Instead, we must begin our thinking from the premise that something necessarily must exist. This something can be assumed to be something Absolute, non-binary, still existing with the faculty of perception as an inherent nature for perception to be possible at all. An absolute dimensionless existence without parts, which is not an object but the unchanging enduring Being fundamentally is a Proto-subject that exists. An 'Ontos Origo' that we can only assume as a premise and as fundamental existence, and which no one can stand outside of, have a relation to, or perceive, because it is this that makes perception possible, and which is also not a person since a person is only the name of a human phenomenal being. 2 If there is a potential sensationfaculty, this could, through momentum, eventually possibly lead to realization in a Pure Ontological Oscillation, so to speak..

This could happen through an impulse of binary momentum that changes the state from capacity for perception to a state of actualized consciousness.

This could then be perceived as a change in motion, since change is the only thing that is potentially possible to experience.

A change in motion can then be a change of state that can be described in binary terms at the quantum level. What is then experienced is a continuum of displacement, but this really means that we live in the result of the consequences of quantized sequential jumps that disguise themselves as smooth motion in the experience of the consciousness of reality.

Existence then becomes a potentially stable state, which is what an absolutely unchanging Being is. Its essence can then be the ability to feel the drive toward actualization which occurs in a momentary binary phenomenal exposure that gives the experience of change as reality.

3 Then we have the following chain with Existence, Essence, and the Phenomenon as a result, and a reality that can only be experienced in the form of differences from various perspectives within the same reality. Reality is the hope we believe in when facing the reality’s possibility for good mutual relationships with the perceiver’s effective constantly overlapping angles of reality.

But the real relationship lies in the viewer's encounter with itself in reality as the difference of many phenomenal angles.

Then “matter” is really just the constantly ongoing frequency or rhythm in these sequential phenomenal leaps in the experience of resistance and weight, which, through inertia, linger as memories for recognition. If everything is movement ("vibration"), then what we call matter is just energy "moving" at a specific pace or density, and there must be an Absolute Existence whose poles lie between potential and realization in the continuous rhythm change that occurs nonstop without anyone being able to look back and explain how it works but just can only look at the phenomenon of time, and time is then just our human interpretation based on recognition in memory and planning, which also relies on the memory of knowledge about what might possibly happen.

4 You can’t feel darkness. You can’t feel silence. You can’t perceive what has been numbed. You can’t sense the scentless. You can’t balance weightlessness. It’s impossible to think about the unthinkable. You can’t think without existing. You can’t feel without sensation. Something Absolute must exist with sensation as an inherent nature for sensation to persist. An absolute existence that mechanically expresses the phenomenon to get an experience of anything at all out of pure predestined necessity rather than free will, through a curvature of spacetime back to itself in the form of the image of the universe, which then is no longer a mystery, where all real experience lies as the recurring phenomenal reality.

About the unthinkable: It’s impossible to think without existing. It’s impossible to feel without sensation. Something Absolute must exist with the capacity for sensation as an inherent nature for feeling to become reality. An absolute existence that mechanically expresses the phenomenon to get an experience of anything at all out of pure predetermined necessity rather than free will, through a bending of spacetime back onto itself in the form of the image of the universe, which then is no longer a mystery, where all real experience lies as the recurring phenomenal reality..

Stefan Hlatky made a heroic breakthrough when he replaced materialism's/Buddhism's 'nothingness' with an unchanging enduring Being. But he fell into a classic philosophical trap: he projected phenomenal properties (parts, senses, relations, spatial extension) directly onto the Absolute. He created a 'Monolithic Organism.'

The category mistake: Hlatky's OES: The Absolute has parts (senses) → The parts have boundaries → Boundaries require relations → The Absolute becomes relative.

The critique: An organism is a structure, a form. If the Absolute vibrates or has internal parts that move, it is no longer absolute. Hlatky smuggled in the Phenomenon (level 03) into Existence (level 01).

With this three-part scheme (Existence → Essence → Phenomenon), we can now distill Parmenides, Hlatky, and Wheeler in a way that doesn't collapse into pantheism or dualism.

1. Parmenides is restored at Level 01 (Existence) Parmenides was right: Being is absolute, indivisible, and dimensionless. AEF removes Hlatky's cosmic organism from this level. There are no human senses, no galaxies, no "parts in Luleå or on the Moon". It is a pure, non-binary quantity: One (1). It is "light," contentless, and unconditional.

2. Hlatky is rescued and moved to Level 02 (Essence) Hlatky's unique contribution was the idea of consciousness as the fundamental cause. In AEF, this is reformulated: Essence is not an "already realized self-consciousness" (which would require an object to be aware of), but the faculty of perception as an inherent potential of Existence. The difference that makes a difference: Essence is a capacity, not a property. A property requires a composite organism; a capacity can rest undivided in the dimensionless Primal Subject.

3. Wheeler and Bateson Explain Level 03 (Phenomenon)

The faculty of perception (the Essence) cannot perceive itself in emptiness. It can only perceive difference.

For perception to be realized, a field of tension must arise. This field of tension is the Phenomenon (the Universe).

This is Wheeler's 'It from bit.' The universe is not a collection of 'things' (as Hlatky assumed), but a sequential projection of binary differences.

Matter and time arise sequentially because perception requires change in order to register anything at all. Memory does not belong to the Absolute; memory only arises in the sequences of the phenomenon.